---
marp: true
theme: gaia
class: invert
paginate: true
title: TAPPaaS one year in — The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
description: Sommerhack 2026, Taler Teltet — 27 August, 15:30
---
# TAPPaaS — one year in
## The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
**Lars Rossen** · Sommerhack 2026 · Taler Teltet
27 August, 15:30
---
## Last year, in this tent, I pitched a dream
> Everyone needs a cloud in their basement.
> A **T**rusted, **A**utomated, fully **P**rivate **P**latform **a**s **a** **S**ervice.
On commodity hardware:
- your data, your hardware
- no hidden fees
- no reliance on closed source
- **no reliance on the Internet**
A year later I am back with the messy proof that it is real —
and to make the case that you should build one too.
---
## The receipts, up front
| | |
| --- | --- |
| First commit | **10 May 2025** — "Initial commit" |
| Commits when I submitted this abstract | **1,091** |
| Commits standing here today | **1,507** |
| Contributors | 3 (I am ~77% of it) |
| ADRs written | **24** |
| **Modules** — 8 foundation · 12 apps · 21 community | **41** |
| Lines of code (bash · TypeScript · Python · Nix) | **126,699** |
| Of which **test** code | **34,490** — 27% |
| Lines of documentation | **~39,500** |
Everything in this talk is in two public repositories. You can check my homework.
---
## What I am actually going to do to you
1. **The Good** — it runs. Here is what "it runs" means, and one surprise.
2. **The Bad** — what this really cost. The commit graph is not pretty.
3. **The Ugly** — the confession. I gave an AI root on every node.
4. **Your turn** — why you should build one, and how to start small.
I am not selling anything. There is nothing to buy.
---
# The Good
It runs.
---
## The iron: three boxes, a switch, an AP and a modem
```mermaid
flowchart TB
n1["tappaas1 — ASUS · EPYC 4464P 12c/24t · 64 GB ECC tanka1 2×4 TB NVMe mirror tankb1 12 TB HDD"]
n2["tappaas2 — Minisforum MS-S1 MAX Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 · 16c/32t 128 GB unified · Radeon 8060S tanka1 2 TB NVMe"]
n3["tappaas3 — TianBei WTR PRO Ryzen 7 5825U · 8c/16t · 32 GB tanka1 1 TB NVMe tankc1 5 TB HDD — PBS"]
sw["UniFi USW Pro XG 10 PoE 10.0.0.201 trunk: mgmt untagged + VLAN 200 310 410 420 430 510 610"]
ap["UniFi Nano HD access point · port 9"]
modem["ISP modem port 5 · VLAN 100 = wan"]
n1 -- "10G · p12" --> sw
n2 -- "10G · p2" --> sw
n3 -- "2.5G · p3" --> sw
sw --- ap
sw --- modem
```
---
## The software: foundation underneath, stacks on top
---
## I promised you eight. There are forty-one.
| Where | # | What is in there |
| --- | ---: | --- |
| **Foundation** — TAPPaaS repo | 8 | `cluster` `network` `templates` `tappaas-cicd` `identity` `backup` `logging` `satellite` |
| **Apps** — TAPPaaS repo | 12 | `nextcloud` `euro-office` `vaultwarden` `litellm` `openwebui` `vllm-amd` `hass` `deconz` `coturn` `nextcloud-hpb` `netbird-client` `windows-server` |
| **Community** repo — *other people* | **21** | `immich` `jellyfin` `wordpress` `forgejo` `mailserver` `hosting` `sonos` `hue` `synology` `reolink` `solaredge` `alfen` `unifi` `shelly-fleet` … |
Twenty-one of those forty-one are **not mine**. Erik wrote 13, Andreas 6.
That is the number I did not dare put in the abstract.
---
## "It runs" is a bigger claim than it sounds
Every one of those services, without me:
- **updates itself** on a schedule — and the update is gated by a test
- **backs itself up** nightly to Proxmox Backup Server, and off-site
- **reports its own health**, so I find out before my family does
- **has a certificate** that renews
- **has one login** — my identity provider, not eight password fields
The interesting engineering is not installing Nextcloud.
It is Nextcloud still being there, patched, in eighteen months, unattended.
---
## One idea does all the work: everything is a module
```text
nextcloud/
├── nextcloud.json # the contract — what it is, needs, provides
├── nextcloud.nix # the NixOS machine
├── install.sh # put it there (once)
├── update.sh # keep it patched (on schedule)
├── test.sh # prove it still works (gates the update)
└── README.md
```
The firewall is a module. The backup server is a module.
The mothership that installs the modules is a module.
**One model to learn, not eight.**
---
## `dependsOn` — the trick the whole thing rests on
```json
{
"description": "Nextcloud — files, calendar, contacts",
"vmname": "nextcloud", "vmid": 210,
"dependsOn": ["cluster:vm", "templates:nixos", "backup:vm",
"network:proxy", "identity:identity"],
"config": {
"cluster:vm": { "cores": 4, "memory": "8192", "diskSize": "64G" },
"network:proxy": { "proxyPort": 443 }
}
}
```
Install **order** is computed from these declarations. Nobody maintains a list.
Add a module, and the platform works out that it needs a VM, an OS, a VLAN,
a certificate, a login and a backup job — in that order.
---
## Reduce flexibility. On purpose.
> A key design goal is to **REDUCE** flexibility.
> There is value in decisions having been taken up front.
Some use cases will not fit TAPPaaS. That is the trade.
For what fits, it is dramatically easier.
Zones, VLANs, naming, storage roles, backup policy, identity model — decided.
You get to pick the applications, and where they live.
---
# The surprise
My basement grew a brain.
---
## Local AI. Private, offline, mine.
| | |
| --- | --- |
| Silicon | AMD Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 — Radeon 8060S (Strix Halo) |
| Memory | **128 GB unified** — the GPU sees nearly all of it |
| Largest model tested | `gpt-oss-120b` — **120B parameters** |
| Speed | ~50 tok/s at 7B FP16 · ~20 tok/s at 30B 4-bit |
| API | OpenAI-compatible, on my own VLAN |
| Data leaving the building | **none** |
One commodity box. Not a rack, not a hyperscaler, not a monthly bill.
---
## The demo I have been waiting a year to do
# Pull the cable out.
Then ask it something.
---
## Why this is the point, not a party trick
Sovereignty is not a checkbox you tick at a vendor.
- The model runs on hardware **you** own
- Your documents are indexed on **your** VLAN
- Nobody re-prices it, deprecates it, or reads it
- It works when the fibre is cut, the account is suspended,
or the terms of service change on a Tuesday
`litellm` in front means apps ask for "a model" — local today,
someone else's tomorrow, **your choice, revocable**.
---
# The Bad
What it actually cost.
---
## The brutal commit graph of a side project
```text
2025-05 99 ██████████ ← the honeymoon
2025-06 21 ██
2025-07 53 █████
2025-08 141 ██████████████ ← Sommerhack 2025
2025-09 6 █ ← life
2025-10 9 █ ← still life
2025-11 41 ████
2025-12 47 █████
2026-01 66 ██████
2026-02 141 ██████████████
2026-03 33 ███
2026-04 19 ██
2026-05 190 ██████████████████
2026-06 351 ██████████████████████████████████ ← something changed
2026-07 164 ████████████████
2026-08 83 ████████ (to the 20th)
```
This is what a real side project looks like. Not a burndown chart. A heartbeat
with two near-death experiences in it.
---
## The two dips are the honest part
**September–October 2025: 15 commits in two months.**
`TODO: what actually happened here — say it plainly, it is the most relatable slide in the deck`
The lesson I take from it: a self-hosted platform that needs *you* every week
is not a platform, it is a pet.
The dips are the real test. The services stayed up.
Because updates, backups and tests do not need me to be enthusiastic.
---
## June 2026: 351 commits. Something changed.
That is not me getting three times better at typing.
That is the month I leaned all the way into AI-assisted development —
which is exactly the confession in part three.
Hold that thought.
---
## The iceberg under every "simple" service
| | Files | Lines |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| **Foundation** — the platform | 575 | **114,138** |
| **Apps** — the things you actually use | 144 | **15,726** |
For every line in an app module, there are **seven lines of platform underneath**.
`tappaas-cicd` alone — the mothership — is **81,942 lines**, 72% of the
foundation. Inside it: 8 TypeScript managers (36,920 lines) and the
controller layer that talks to Proxmox, OPNsense and the switch (29,352).
---
## What it costs in money
| | |
| --- | --- |
| Hardware | `TODO: what you actually spent, be honest, include the mistakes` |
| Electricity | `TODO: measured W → kr/year at current DK prices` |
| Satellite VPS | `TODO: kr/month` |
| Domain + DNS | `TODO:` |
| Licences | 0 |
| **Versus the hyperscaler equivalent** | `TODO: the comparison, done fairly — include your time at 0` |
The honest framing: this is **not** cheaper if you value your time at anything.
It is cheaper if you were going to tinker anyway, and it is *ownable* at any price.
---
## What it costs in things that are not money
- **Learning curve you cannot delegate** — Proxmox, NixOS, OPNsense, ZFS,
VLANs, PKI, OIDC. Any one of those is a weekend. You need all six.
- **You are the on-call.** At 22:00. On holiday.
- **Family SLA.** The moment calendars are on it, downtime is a domestic matter,
not a technical one.
- **Decision fatigue** — which is precisely why the project reduces flexibility.
- **The "why don't you just" tax** — from every friend, every time.
`TODO: your best war story — the outage that taught you the most`
---
## What I got wrong
`TODO: pick three, be specific, be unflattering — this slide buys credibility for everything else`
Candidates from the graph and the repo:
- Numbered foundation modules (`05-`, `10-`, `30-`…) — retired in the ADR-007
refactor once ordering had to come from `dependsOn` instead
- `TODO:`
- `TODO:`
The pattern: everywhere I encoded an ordering or a name as a *convention*,
I later had to make it a *declaration*.
---
# The Ugly
The confession.
---
# I used AI to build it.
# And I gave it root on every node.
Not "AI-assisted autocomplete".
Root. `ssh`. `nixos-rebuild`. `qm`. `pvesh`. The firewall. The secrets.
---
## Why on earth would you do that
Because the alternative was that it never got built.
- One retiree, evenings and weekends, six unfamiliar technology stacks
- 112,000 lines of platform code for thirteen app modules
- The plumbing is *tedious*, not clever — the exact shape of work to hand over
The graph does not lie: **May 190, June 351.** That is what handing over the
tedium looks like.
And the honest part: I could not have hand-written the last third of this.
---
# So the real question is not "did you"
# It is: **what did you fence it with?**
The guardrails are not vibes. They are written down, in the repo,
loaded on every single session, and they override anything the model
would otherwise default to.
---
## Guardrail 1 — the line it may never cross
> **Never run `git commit` or `git push` — full stop.**
> The operator performs ALL commits and pushes themselves.
> This holds even when a request seems to imply it — "land it", "ship it",
> "move this to main" — and even when a previous turn involved committing.
> That is NOT standing authorization.
The AI may change any file on disk. It may not make a change **permanent**.
Every single line that entered history passed under my eyes.
---
## Guardrail 2 — the blast radius is designed
| Layer | What it bounds |
| --- | --- |
| **Modules** | A mistake lands in one VM, not "the server" |
| **Zones** | A compromised VM cannot reach what its VLAN forbids |
| **Proxmox snapshots** | Minutes-old rollback, per machine |
| **PBS + off-site** | Nightly, immutable, pull-based |
| **NixOS** | `nixos-rebuild test` before `switch` — a bad config dies at reboot |
| **30,282 lines of tests** | The update does not land unless the service proves it works |
Root access is only terrifying if the system underneath is a snowflake.
Mine is disposable by construction.
---
## Guardrail 3 — confirm before the irreversible
The standing rules, as written:
- **Confirm before destructive ops** — deleting a VM it did not create,
dropping a storage pool, force-pushing `main`/`stable`, wiping `/etc/secrets`
- **Fix root causes, not symptoms** — no `--no-verify`, no silenced errors,
no bypassed CI to make an install "succeed"
- **Read before you rebuild** — `test` before `switch`
- **Propose tests first**, then run them
Note what these have in common: they are all rules about **honesty**,
not about capability.
---
## Guardrail 4 — I stayed the reviewer
Eight specialist roles — architect, bash, python, nix, tester, security,
infra, PM — with a security review in the path of every change.
But the load-bearing part is duller than that:
- I read the diff
- I write the commit message
- I press the button
- 24 ADRs exist so that *I* still know why the system is shaped this way
The day I stop reading diffs, this stops being sovereign
and starts being someone else's system running in my basement.
---
## Am I still in control? Honestly.
**Yes — but "control" moved.**
I no longer control every line. I control:
- the **architecture** — modules, zones, contracts
- the **gate** — commits, pushes, releases
- the **proof** — 145 test suites, 29% of the source, that must be green
- the **exit** — it is all open source, on my hardware, in my hands
That is a real answer, not a comfortable one. Ask me the hard version in Q&A.
---
# Your turn
Build one too.
---
## Why you, specifically, should
**European sovereignty is not a policy problem you can wait out.**
It is thousands of small boxes, in basements and back offices,
running software nobody can withdraw.
- Your data has to live *somewhere*. Somewhere can be here.
- A skill you own beats a subscription you rent.
- Every basement cloud makes the next one cheaper to build.
`TODO: your one-sentence version of this — say it in your own words, not mine`
---
## Start smaller than I did
| Step | What you get |
| --- | --- |
| 1. One box, evaluation tier | 4 cores / 16 GB / a disk. Nested virt is fine. |
| 2. Proxmox + OPNsense | Zones, VLANs, DNS, certificates that renew |
| 3. The mothership | `tappaas-cicd` — the thing that installs the rest |
| 4. **One** service | Vaultwarden. Small, useful, immediately missed. |
| 5. Backup **before** service two | Non-negotiable. Ask me why. |
No public IP? A satellite VPS is the escape hatch.
No GPU? Skip local AI, keep everything else.
---
## Where to find all of it
- **tappaas.org** — docs, work in progress, honest about it
- **codeberg.org/TAPPaaS/TAPPaaS** — the code, the 24 ADRs, the commit graph
- **sovereigncomputing.org** — the wider argument
- **This deck** — slides.makerfloss.eu/tappaas/one-year-in
- **MakerFLOSS** — Orange Makerspace, bi-weekly FLOSS jam. Come build one with us.
Contributions welcome. Open an issue before you open a pull request —
somebody may already be packaging your app.
---
# Questions
The harder, the better.